World ( The cow news digital ) A recent congressional hearing in Washington has drawn attention after a U.S. lawmaker cited claims suggesting significant losses suffered by the United States Air Force during an alleged conflict scenario involving Iran.
During a Senate committee session, Democratic Congressman Edward Case questioned the Pentagon’s Chief Financial Officer, Jay Hurst, on reported operational and equipment losses. However, officials reportedly avoided providing direct answers, offering limited or unclear responses to several inquiries.
The lawmaker referenced reporting by the defense-focused publication The War Zone, which claimed that during a 39-day period of heightened military activity, the U.S. Air Force conducted approximately 13,000 sorties. According to the cited report, multiple aircraft and unmanned systems were damaged or destroyed during operations.
Among the reported losses were 24 MQ-9 Reaper drones, along with several F-15 and A-10 fighter aircraft. The claims also included an assertion that a fifth-generation Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II aircraft was struck within Iranian airspace, though the pilot reportedly survived the incident.
Additional unverified claims suggested that some aircraft were also lost in nearby airspace, including areas such as Kuwait, amid ongoing operational challenges in the region. The report further stated that certain military assets may have been intentionally destroyed to prevent them from falling into opposing hands.
However, these figures and incidents have not been independently confirmed by official U.S. defense sources or neutral international observers. The Pentagon has not issued detailed public verification regarding the specific losses mentioned during the hearing.
read more
Defense analysts caution that information emerging from congressional testimony and secondary defense reports often includes preliminary or contested data that may later be revised or clarified.
The discussion highlights growing scrutiny in Washington over military spending, operational transparency, and the strategic risks associated with high-intensity deployments in sensitive regions.
